competing with China

Wednesday, 22 June 2005 10:25 am
miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
[personal profile] miriam_e

Out stupid "leaders" have this insane belief that we need to compete directly with China and that the way to become competitive is to reduce working conditions and wages of workers to those of third world countries. That is plain crazy though, as just a moment's thought will show.

We have many advantages here that the people in China and India don't have and the very reason they are willing to work in lousy conditions and low wages is to gain access to a similar level of lifestyle and wealth. Why in heaven's name would we abandon that? Why would we abandon progress?

We should be working to maintain and improve our lifestyle, not deliberately wrecking it. We should be increasing the level of education, improving working conditions, increasing leisure hours. These are the very things that the third world want and are working towards. We should also be working in that direction and maintaining our lead. We can never hope to compete with China and India on their terms -- low wages and godawful cheap working conditions. To attempt it is economic and social suicide.

The unimaginative bean-counters tell us that we have no choice. They tell us that money is flowing out of our country into the third world countries too fast. That we will have to tighten our belts and get ready for lean times ahead. But reducing wages and destroying working conditions here won't affect that in the long run, and will actually worsen it. Our only hope is to build upon what we can do best and sell that to the rest of the world. For a long time tourism has been Australia's biggest money-earner, but politicians still treat us as just a primary producer -- mining and farming. We have some of the best medical researchers in the world; our solar research is among the best on the planet; we need to expand on our intellectual and creative capital, which is up there with the best anywhere. As Richard Florida points out, the biggest potential for the future is in the creative classes. But our blasted government keeps strangling our learning and research opportunities and making those sectors less and less competitive.

Can we please get someone in government that knows how to lead and govern, not simply lie, cheat, and line the pockets of their wealthy and powerful pals?

Date: 2005-07-03 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
If that was always the case we would have dispensed with it ages ago, but it has continued because we occasionally get very good and capable people in public office. Unfortunately the more common assholes lie to make themselves look as much like the goodies as possible.

I'm hoping that, with a new way becoming obvious now through the rise of the open source movement, we might just be able to get rid of politics. At the moment we need government to balance power against the giant corporations... unfortunately fascist governments become intimately allied with corporations and become an even worse threat to humanity. And our government is becoming worryingly fascist.

Dictionary definition of fascism:
fascism (fash·iz´em) n. 1. A philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with an ideology of belligerant nationalism.

Date: 2005-07-03 03:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j03j03.livejournal.com
right on.

Profile

miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
miriam_e

February 2026

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Wednesday, 4 February 2026 02:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios