miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
[personal profile] miriam_e
Got a propaganda leaflet from Telstra. (For those of you not in Australia Tesltra is our biggest telecommunications company -- they used to be a somewhat benign government-owned monopoly, but since being privatised have taken a holy "Greed is Good" approach to everything they do. Swindling their customers at any chance.) This leaflet purports to complain that government regulations are keeping Telstra from getting broadband to the Australian public. What a load of crap! What is keeping broadband restricted in Australia is the incredibly high prices charged, and this is a result of how Telstra still own most of the infrastructure and force their competitors' prices up. The whole idea of selling off Telstra was a con from the start. It should have been kept as a public entity and used as a way to ensure private companies don't take advantage of their customers. Instead, a greedy government sold our heritage off for quick cash and we will pay for it in decreased services and increased prices forever afterward.

Have you noticed how few free, value-added services remained after Telstra was privatised?
Have you noticed how free-market advocates trumpetted that since privatisation Telstra phone call charges have fallen? But have you noticed how your bill has continued to get bigger because although individual calls are slightly lower, rental prices have risen manyfold.
Have you noticed how these supposedly cheaper call prices still keep it far more expensive to phone a nearby city here in Australia than to phone the other side of the planet?
Have you noticed how costly mobile phones are compared to land-lines? And did you know it is actually cheaper to run a mobile network than a land-line one?
Have you noticed how much cheaper mobile phones are in other countries?

Telstra, as a company, have become the worst bunch of liars. This leaflet is an example of the bullshit they dish out now.

If Telstra were given complete control of the broadband market their current performance of providing the worst broadband service of all gives us an idea of what we could expect.

Date: 2007-03-25 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com
Telstra is a fine example of how bad an idea privitisation is. I don't fault their current behaviour, however: they're doing exactly what a good private company should. It just highlights the failure of the current government's ideology: the imposition of private models on public services.

Which is why I was kinda pleased to see them squirming recently when the company started complaining about government controls and strictures: the government, despite their being the instigators of this new Frankenstein's Monster, still has this concept that Telstra should operate as a plaything for them.

*sigh* They continue to cock up, and continue to refuse to take their lumps.

Date: 2007-03-26 03:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
Capitalism is a wonderful invention. It can do a lot of fantastic things. It has built-in checks and balances that make it responsive to the needs of the population in ways that feudalism, communism, fascism, dictatorship, and theocracy never could. It works incredibly well, especially in extreme decentralisation. The problem is, this all breaks down when any group grows too powerful, which is why we have measures to prevent monopolies. Capitalism, unfortunately, undoes itself because companies often tend to grow bigger and more powerful and this undercuts most of capitalism's great advantages.

In this respect I think Telstra is not a good example of capitalism. They don't do what a good private company should. They lie, and cheat, and try to screw over their customers, and try to bully others every chance they get. Telstra is a perfect example of what is killing capitalism.

Capitalism could work really well to everyone's advantage, but the ugly little genie of sociopathic mentality keeps getting loose and blowing it. I doubt that many corporations will take long-term views of the world or consider social value as a way to increase monetary value. Some will -- some always have -- but most won't.

I have a feeling we are nearing a change... one of those big, world changes, like the end-of-feudalism kind of change. I think capitalism is approaching its use-by date. I don't know what is coming next, but I think it will have social justice built into it and will automatically impede powerful groups.

Date: 2007-03-26 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com
Okay. I'm reading that the capitalist structure is an effective one, but corporative bodies undermine its strengths? I'd certainly agree with that.

Date: 2007-03-26 11:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
Yep, capitalism beats most things, but its tendency for some companies to grow without limit screws it every time. Capitalism works best on the small scale, in my opinion -- corner stores, owner drivers, individual musicians, doctors, and so on. As soon as these join together into larger entities it starts to go wrong (no absolutely every time, but most times... just like there can be benevolent dictators, generally dictatorships are not a good idea).

Profile

miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
miriam_e

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7 8 910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 12:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios