miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
[personal profile] miriam_e
A decline in the proportion of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions absorbed by land and oceans is speeding up the growth of atmospheric CO2, according to a paper published today in the US Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

Lead author and Executive Director of the Global Carbon Project, CSIRO's Dr Pep Canadell, says the acceleration is due to three factors: global economic growth; the world's economy becoming more carbon intense (that is, since 2000 more carbon is being emitted to produce each dollar of global wealth); and a deterioration in the land and oceans' ability to absorb carbon from the atmosphere at the required rate.

"What we are seeing is a decrease in the planet's ability to absorb carbon emissions due to human activity," Dr Canadell says.

"Fifty years ago, for every tonne of CO2 emitted, 600kg were removed by land and ocean sinks. However, in 2006, only 550kg were removed per tonne and that amount is falling."

Dr Canadell says the results have major implications for the current and future growth of atmospheric CO2.

"The majority of current emission scenarios for modelling climate through the 21st century assume sustained decreases in the carbon intensity of the global economy, which have not occurred since 2000," he says.

CSIRO's Dr Mike Raupach, a co-chair of the Global Carbon Project, says "The carbon cycle is generating stronger-than-expected and sooner-than-expected climate 'forcing' - that is, mechanisms that 'force' the climate to change. In turn, climate change itself is feeding back to affect the carbon cycle, decreasing land and ocean sinks."

Most of the co-authors of the study - including Dr Canadell and Dr Raupach - are members of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2007 earlier this month.

Dr Raupach says the research shows that the Earth is losing its restorative capacity to absorb CO2 emissions following massive increases in emissions over the past half century. "The longer we delay reducing emissions, the more restorative capacity will be lost," Dr Raupach says.


Paper available at: http://www.globalcarbonproject.org

Further Information:

Dr Mike Raupach, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
02 6246 5573; 1408 260 825; Mike.Raupach@csiro.au

Dr Pep Canadell, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
+61 40706 8930; Pep.Canadell@csiro.au

Media Assistance:
Bill Stephens, CSIRO Media Liaison
02 6176 6153; 0408 817 066

Date: 2007-10-26 08:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
I heard something a while back about the supposed reasons why permafrost melt wasn't as great a danger as had originally been thought. I can't remember what the reasoning was now. Perhaps the melted lands will allow more vegetation to grow and the liquid water to dissolve more greenhouse gases.

But I'm surprised they aren't accounting for land-locked ice in sealevel rise. Given the experience in the Antarctica where vast areas can unexpectedly lose their ice within just weeks, this is a crazy mistake to make.

Some of the CSIRO scientists were upset a while back that management was meddling in their science and warning them not to speak out on so-called politically sensitive issues. Most particularly those involved in climate research were angered at being muzzled. I'd assumed that this had ended after the media uproar about it. Perhaps it is still going on. What a horrible thought! We all shrug our shoulders and expect science to be suppressed in the increasingly totalitarian political atmosphere in USA, but we don't think of it happening here. Somehow I'd always felt the CSIRO to be above that.

Profile

miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
miriam_e

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7 8 910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 06:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios