miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
[personal profile] miriam_e
That is the slogan used by Google.
Are they living up to it? We all remember how they bowed immediately to censorship in China. That was a big disappointment.
Now Georgia has disappeared* from GoogleMaps.

[*I've since been told Georgia was never on GoogleMaps, but this is no less puzzling than a recent disappearance would be. Maps of that region have been available for decades. What possible reason would there be for omitting such a world trouble-spot?]

http://twxr.us/1a5

or see on GoogleMaps itself:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=&ie=UTF8&ll=41.926803,44.648438&spn=4.119432,7.349854&z=7

Bummer.

Additional: There is a very nice 2,529 x 1,872 map on Wikipedia at
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Georgia_high_detail_map.png
in the article there on Georgia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_(country)

Date: 2008-08-12 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greylock.livejournal.com
Google isn't doing evil.
It is just becoming evil.
And when you're evil, evil is good.

Of course, I can see Georgia on the Google Maps link, but not any sign of the two "breakway provinces". It's still there on sat-view as well.

The optimist in me has decided to believe that the layer which has been removed is missing so that people can't use Google Maps to target bombs and stuff. IIRC you are on dial-up, so neither of us can check Google Earth - but I can say that in sat-view there are some really weird processing anomalies - like large white smears - reflections perhaps?

Date: 2008-08-12 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dances-withcats.livejournal.com
I zoomed in on the large white smears and they appear to be clouds. That's not to say those clouds couldn't have been photoshopped in, because they do look rather odd and blandly white for clouds. Also, there's a whole lot of "sorry, we don't have any images at that level of zoom" stuff if you zoom in close on certain parts of the country.

Date: 2008-08-12 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greylock.livejournal.com
I zoomed in on the large white smears and they appear to be clouds

Not to my eyes, I have seen clouds before, which is why I thought they might be flares off metal constructions. At the speed the sats are travelling... maybe.

Am I the only one who thought Georgia looked more poked than a 14-year-old boy's face?

Also, there's a whole lot of "sorry, we don't have any images at that level of zoom" stuff if you zoom in close on certain parts of the country.

That happens, perhaps at the Government's request, perhaps because it doesn't load properly.
The two other nations east of Georgia are lacking in details too, so I think it's too early to call this a conspiracy.

Date: 2008-08-12 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
The optimist in me has decided to believe that the layer which has been removed is missing so that people can't use Google Maps to target bombs and stuff.

The military would not need GoogleMaps. They have their own maps. Only the civilians would really be need it. Those inside the defaced country might be trying to escape or work out where the threats are. Those outside would be trying to understand what is going on inside.

Date: 2008-08-12 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greylock.livejournal.com
The military would not need GoogleMaps. They have their own maps. Only the civilians would really be need it.

Gawsh... Cynical? More than me?
Civilians would, in all likelihood, know how to get out, either by UBD or physical maps. I doubt the vast population of Georgia use GoogleMaps while driving (does anyone?), and if they do use similar they would have GPSen such as TomTom. Or they could just follow the sun.

Those outside would be trying to understand what is going on inside.
Given the frequency at which Google updates its maps, they would be less than useful.

Date: 2008-08-12 10:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
I don't know about you, but I always check the maps before I drive anywhere that I don't regularly visit, even within the local 50kms.

Also, I tend to examine online maps rather than rely on outdated paper maps, then download them to my little Palm computer and use it. When Mum & Dad recently had to visit a doctor in a part of Brisbane that they were unfamiliar with I printed out some online maps for them to use.

From what I've heard, I'm not alone in this. Online maps are heavily used by civilians. I don't imagine the military would need them. I've seen the kind of maps that the Australian Army use. They are incredibly detailed.

If you wanted to get out of Australia and you were unable to leave via Perth or Fremantle, would you attempt to look up online maps for other airports or seaports? You, like me, love books so there is a chance you have that information on paper, but most people don't, outside their local area.

Given the frequency at which Google updates its maps, they would be less than useful.

If they were looking for some view of the action, yes. But that isn't what people view maps for, generally. It is to find out where exactly in Georgia Tblisi is or Sukhumi is when the news mentions such places. Interestingly such place coordinates are contained in GoogleMaps so you can search for them if you have the correct spelling, but the lack of annotations would make life difficult for civilians.

Date: 2008-08-12 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greylock.livejournal.com
I don't know about you, but I always check the maps before I drive anywhere that I don't regularly visit, even within the local 50kms.

Oh, I do that - but usually my UBD (unless it's somwhere for work, then I print out the map from Whereis.com.au so I don't have to brave the traffic, find a parking spot and then find I'm at the wrong end of the street.)

If you wanted to get out of Australia and you were unable to leave via Perth or Fremantle, would you attempt to look up online maps for other airports or seaports?


Given the general lack of roads out of Perth, and the number of ports/airports, I probably wouldn't need to - but I take youer point.

Date: 2008-08-12 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dances-withcats.livejournal.com
Wow. Georgia's gone all Bermuda Triangle and stuff!

It is perhaps, as [livejournal.com profile] greylock suggested, an attempt to remove that layer of information that could help "the enemy" target some bombable locations. After all, the US is a strong ally/supporter of Georgia, and it is possible that Google caved to government insistence that all that information be removed.

I'll have to check Google Earth and see the satellite maps, too. Satellite images may either be old or censored in order to avoid civilian snooping or snooping by other countries' intelligence agencies.

Edit: Apparently Armenia and Azerbaijan no longer have roads, mountains and rivers, either!
Edited Date: 2008-08-12 01:31 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-08-12 03:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnnybrainwash.livejournal.com
Georgia hasn't disappeared from Google maps. It was never there. There's always been satellite imagery, which is still available, but there have never been street/road maps.

I've been following Georgia for years, and always been frustrated by this. But nothing has changed in the last week.

plz check facts before accusing kthxbai

Date: 2008-08-12 09:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
Thank you.

But I find this extremely surprising. Why would they not have maps of Georgia? It seems to me that it would not be terribly difficult to obtain maps of Georgia. I have old world atlases on paper that have roads and cities mapped inside Georgia, Armenia, etc.

You point up an interesting problem of the internet: exactly how would one check whether something used to be on the internet. Please note that I'm not disagreeing with you. I would have loved to check whether the images had recently evaporated, but the ephemeral nature of the net makes this pretty-much impossible.

I have in the past managed to use the Internet Archive Project to dredge up data that the Australian government deleted from their sites (in particular a study into relative costs of different forms of energy) when their (corrupt) aims didn't fit reality. So sometimes you can verify that something has been removed from the net. But GoogleMaps blocks the InternetArchive bots (I've checked) so no history is visible. There are perfectly legitimate reasons to block archiving bots, bandwidth limitations being the main one.

And that brings up yet another question: how responsible is it of our civilisation to rely on ephemeral information sources that can be so easily controlled and manipulated? For instance I love the Wikipedia project, but it all lives on centralised servers. That is very unsafe.

Date: 2008-08-13 01:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnnybrainwash.livejournal.com
My best guess, and I don't really know, is that there are no current maps that are reliable enough to meet Google's standards. Georgia may have had more pressing concerns since the Soviet collapse than updating their maps, and Google probably wants to ensure a certain level of quality.

A lot of less-developed countries have only major highways marked (try Afghanistan and Zimbabwe), and I'm pretty sure I've seen other countries with nothing at all.

Date: 2008-08-13 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
The cities haven't changed their names or locations in decades, but they aren't marked. If you search for them GoogleMaps proves it actually has their positions in its database, because it will find them (Search for Sukhumi for instance). So it can't be ascribed to lack of precision. The lack of names on the map is weird. I can't imagine an honest reason for it.

Date: 2008-08-14 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
Wikipedia has a fairly detailed (2,529 x 1,872 pixel) map at
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Georgia_high_detail_map.png
in their article on Georgia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_(country))

Date: 2008-08-13 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sharpblonde.livejournal.com
Ugh. Besides this whole issue of proper maps in trouble areas, this post just points out to me how America-centric the media makes people. I don't know about in other areas, but certainly in Canada and the U.S.. I thought of Georgia the U.S. State, before I thought of the country... and I always seem to.

Date: 2008-08-14 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miriam-e.livejournal.com
Heheheh The news of Russia invading and bombing it must have been a bit worrying then. :)

The first thing I think of when I hear of Georgia is the Beatles' song "Back in the USSR", so our culture has far reaching effects on us all. Georgia existed many decades before the Beatles mentioned it only a couple of times in the chorus, but that song is what my mind zeros in on.

Looking on Wikipedia, Georgia is a beautiful place. Agriculture and tourism are their two big money earners. I bet they are regretting the oil pipeline and the gas pipeline through their country that seem to have brought the Russians invading. I don't think it will have helped their tourist industry much. Poor Georgians.

Profile

miriam_e: from my drawing MoonGirl (Default)
miriam_e

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7 8 910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 02:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios