net weirdness
Jun. 10th, 2010 02:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've noticed that accessing web pages has become significantly more unreliable lately -- just in the last month or so. Pages refuse to fully load, or even load at all, the net seems quite a bit slower, and there was my problem this morning of an email not downloading then disappearing entirely on the second attempt.
Has anybody else noticed a recent increase in internet flakiness?
I'm wondering if Australia's net censoring might be responsible. I don't think it has been widely implemented yet, but perhaps discreet "trials" are continuing.
Or might it be the internet service provider I'm signed up with?
Has anybody else noticed a recent increase in internet flakiness?
I'm wondering if Australia's net censoring might be responsible. I don't think it has been widely implemented yet, but perhaps discreet "trials" are continuing.
Or might it be the internet service provider I'm signed up with?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 04:24 am (UTC)Actually, yes.
I have. Whichever version of Firefox I have at work is *really* crashy (must update) but I've noticed this across the board that some websites (toplessrobot.com is one I can think of) don't quite load. It might take 2-3 refreshes to get there.
If I remember, you're on dial up, so I'm not surprised you're having issues. Most of the web just isn't designed for those slow speeds these days, and I have a sneaking suspicion more and more content is being increasingly designed for considerably faster broadband speeds than ADSL 2+ via Helstra or Optus allow us to have.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:19 am (UTC)I'm not the only one who is having problems though. A friend near here has problems accessing web pages. At first I thought it might be that he is using MSWindows, and part of the problem clearly is that, but even trying Linux on his connection resulted in stalling webpage loads.
Definitely much content is designed now for lavish speeds. I'm somewhat pissed at Wikipedia lately. Their pages have routinely become some of the slowest to load. They have enormous volumes of data in even the simplest pages. If you look at the source code it is amazing. Not only does each page have heaps of unneeded scripting, but it will pull in reams of other scripting as well. Some of it is to do cute (but unnecessary) tricks like the pop-up list of commonly accessed topics when you start typing in a search term. All this scripting for the sake of look and cute stuff is fine for people with fast connections, but most of the world still has slow connections. Sometimes I find myself waiting quarter of an hour or more for a Wikipedia page to load, and during that time, because it is all in tables, my view of the page is just a blank window. Not good.
Often I wonder if google-analytics is slowing the web too. I know pages have Doubleclick.com track users slow loading terribly. I'll often get fed up and tired of waiting for a page serviced by them before it loads and close it.
I offered my services free of charge to a charity to author their web pages for them, but there is little chance of that offer being taken up. The lady who has the say of yay or nay wants lots of pretty gadgets on the page, because they are fashionable. I pointed out to her that these pages are about delivering information about a charity that helps people in a third world country, not delivering high art. Okay, I didn't say it quite like that; I was a bit more diplomatic. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:25 am (UTC)Not much point having it then, although if I recall shaping is usually at 64k over the theoretical maximum dial-up up of 56k.
If google-analytics, Doubleclick and scripting are annoying you try NoScript. It might speed it up, although how much it stops the scripts from downloading is a mystery to me it stops them running which is great.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:42 am (UTC)Come back to Abbottopia. You know you want to.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:09 am (UTC)You don't see that in Scandanavia because of the crippling 50% tax rate.
I suddenly have the over-whelming desire to see Estonia.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:36 am (UTC)Poor little billionaires.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:15 am (UTC)NoScript. I'll look into that. Thanks.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:17 am (UTC)Heh. I forgot that little benefit of broadband. It's awesome.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:34 am (UTC)