anti-piracy nuts are an unbalanced lot
Jun. 20th, 2003 11:59 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
miriam_eYou would think Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee would be a smart person. Well, he might be smart in some sense, but he seems somewhat retarded in another. He is so fired up about the online file-sharing debate he is actually promoting the idea of destroying people's computers remotely.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6559-2003Jun17.html
Yeah, right. That will really help! Did you read about the nasty cease-and-desist letters threatening legal action that were erroneously sent out by the music industry recently to a whole lot of people who had nothing to do with filesharing? I can just see a future scenario where the music industry nutters set loose some vicious worm that destroys computers, only to find that it is running rampant, targetting the wrong people, and everybody is powerless to stop it.
Another scenario is where pirates so affected (whose activities are really largely benign) target the music industry systems in retaliation. If the music industry wants to start a war then I am sure that is just what they will get.
There have been studies that show that people who share the most mp3s are also the biggest buyers of CDs. There is plenty of evidence to show that online piracy is not having any negative effect on CD sales, and some evidence that it actually acts as free advertising.
The music industry is its own worst enemy. They are pissing off their own customers by continually attacking them while dragging their feet about introducing beneficial new technology. At the other end, they bind their artists with excessively restrictive and controlling contracts while delivering very little of value, so that many artists are now starting their own internet-based music businesses, taking CD orders from home and mailing them to customers rather than copping the big bills from the industry. Music industry fat-cats take whopping salaries and pay peanuts to the musicians upon whose backs they ride. Many musicians make nothing from the industry which purports to protect them. Live shows are their only hope of an income.
The first thing I do when I buy a CD is rip it. I prefer to play mp3s than CDs... actually I've come to prefer Ogg-Vorbis format over mp3 (open source, no licensing, better quality, smaller files). I've been trying to work out a way to pay musicians directly for downloaded music without risking being busted for downloading it. I figure if I pay the musician more than what the record company pays then we both win. I believe artists generally get about $1 per CD in Australia (about 50 cents in US). If I pay maybe $1 per song, depending on how much I like it, then I reward my favorite artists while by-passing the nasty music industry.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6559-2003Jun17.html
Yeah, right. That will really help! Did you read about the nasty cease-and-desist letters threatening legal action that were erroneously sent out by the music industry recently to a whole lot of people who had nothing to do with filesharing? I can just see a future scenario where the music industry nutters set loose some vicious worm that destroys computers, only to find that it is running rampant, targetting the wrong people, and everybody is powerless to stop it.
Another scenario is where pirates so affected (whose activities are really largely benign) target the music industry systems in retaliation. If the music industry wants to start a war then I am sure that is just what they will get.
There have been studies that show that people who share the most mp3s are also the biggest buyers of CDs. There is plenty of evidence to show that online piracy is not having any negative effect on CD sales, and some evidence that it actually acts as free advertising.
The music industry is its own worst enemy. They are pissing off their own customers by continually attacking them while dragging their feet about introducing beneficial new technology. At the other end, they bind their artists with excessively restrictive and controlling contracts while delivering very little of value, so that many artists are now starting their own internet-based music businesses, taking CD orders from home and mailing them to customers rather than copping the big bills from the industry. Music industry fat-cats take whopping salaries and pay peanuts to the musicians upon whose backs they ride. Many musicians make nothing from the industry which purports to protect them. Live shows are their only hope of an income.
The first thing I do when I buy a CD is rip it. I prefer to play mp3s than CDs... actually I've come to prefer Ogg-Vorbis format over mp3 (open source, no licensing, better quality, smaller files). I've been trying to work out a way to pay musicians directly for downloaded music without risking being busted for downloading it. I figure if I pay the musician more than what the record company pays then we both win. I believe artists generally get about $1 per CD in Australia (about 50 cents in US). If I pay maybe $1 per song, depending on how much I like it, then I reward my favorite artists while by-passing the nasty music industry.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re:
Date: 2003-06-19 08:07 pm (UTC)On the one hand I don't get what the fuss is about really, as we used to just copy each other's albums to cassette anyway when I was a kid. On the other hand that took effort and organisation, whereas with the net I can grab buckets of stuff while I sleep. And on the other hand again, there's conflicting data as to how badly filesharing is affecting the industry (or if it's affecting it at all).
RE people - oh yeah. In spades.