a new way to censor the net?
Jun. 10th, 2010 12:40 pmI just now tried to download my email, and the email client timed out during the download of some large email someone had sent me. It must have had a whole lot of images in it. So I tried again. Surprisingly the email wasn't there in the second attempt. My email client seems to have deleted it. That's a slight annoyance, but people should really expect that sending large attachments is dicey, also that can be an annoyance to people on slow net connections.
Anyway, that's not my main point... I logged onto the web interface of my mail server in the hope that the message might still be there, but expecting it wouldn't. I was right that it wasn't, but I found something rather worrying. My email server has been quietly filtering out email from the human rights organisation Avaaz and the anti-religion organisation Project Reason so that I didn't receive them. If I hadn't logged onto the web interface, which I almost never use, I would never have known. It strikes me as weird that only these two were filtered out. I am subscribed to dozens of mailing lists. Why are only these two blocked? It strikes me that this would be a perfect way to unobtrusively censor people's communications, while allowing plausible deniability "We were simply providing it as a service". But if it was a service, the default would be to allow them to pass through and give me the option of blocking them if I wish.
I'd previously thought having my server located in the USA instead of Australia was a good thing, given Australia politicians' desire to make us the only democratic country on the planet to censor the net. But now I'm not too sure. Maybe I should look to Tonga or some place less likely to do naughty stuff.
Anyway, that's not my main point... I logged onto the web interface of my mail server in the hope that the message might still be there, but expecting it wouldn't. I was right that it wasn't, but I found something rather worrying. My email server has been quietly filtering out email from the human rights organisation Avaaz and the anti-religion organisation Project Reason so that I didn't receive them. If I hadn't logged onto the web interface, which I almost never use, I would never have known. It strikes me as weird that only these two were filtered out. I am subscribed to dozens of mailing lists. Why are only these two blocked? It strikes me that this would be a perfect way to unobtrusively censor people's communications, while allowing plausible deniability "We were simply providing it as a service". But if it was a service, the default would be to allow them to pass through and give me the option of blocking them if I wish.
I'd previously thought having my server located in the USA instead of Australia was a good thing, given Australia politicians' desire to make us the only democratic country on the planet to censor the net. But now I'm not too sure. Maybe I should look to Tonga or some place less likely to do naughty stuff.