3 days to save elephants

[miriam_e]

Elephants are highly intelligent and are one of the few animals that can recognise themselves in a mirror. They are social animals who experience great anguish when a member of their group is hurt or dies, they are known to make art, music, show compassion, and look after one another's young. Their long lifespan (they can live to more than 80 years) gives them extremely low birth rates and makes them very prone to extinction. In the wild, adult elephants have no natural enemies, except humans. We were wiping them off the face of the Earth until the international ban on ivory dried up most of the profit in killing them. Now Tanzania and Zambia want to lift the ban on ivory sales, which will open the channels for poachers again, even in countries that keep the ban.

Keep the ban on ivory.

We have a rapidly closing window of 3 days to make public opinion heard here.

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/no_more_bloody_ivory_gg/

Comments

[miriam-e.livejournal.com]

Ah, yes. You limit "freedom" (as do most people) as applying only to humans. It used to only apply to white, adult males, but has now widened to people of any color, recently in many places to include females, and to some degree, children. It has also begun to include some animals. For me it is natural to include all highly intelligent beings. Elephants' freedom is definitely affected by the profitability of the market for their body parts.

In pointing out that reality means we must expect that the majority will often win over the minority I'm not saying I like it. As you say, it has from time to time produced abhorrent results. I'm just pointing out that this is how things work (and, incidentally, why we are unlikely to ever get a blanket ban on ivory). I've been enjoying James Suroweicki's amazing book "The Wisdom of Crowds" lately, which points to some possible ways to avoid just such glaring problems in democracy. I highly recommend it. (Want me to send it to you? Email me at mim at miriam-english dot org if you want me to send it. It's actually an audiobook.)

While I like to agree with your final point that our enjoyment of life is limited by our lack of freedom, that is surprisingly not the case. There are many situations where we can be much happier with reduced freedoms. This is a bit of a worry which I think we should all be very careful of because it can easily become a rationale for restricting freedom beyond what is practical into what is comfortable and then into what becomes draconian repression -- just an interesting side-issue to be aware of.

I'm in favor of maximising our freedoms and limiting how much we tread on the toes of others... even elephants' and other intelligent creatures'. The boundary for each person is where a lot of the problems in society occur.